China · Zhejiang · Platform Liability

Hangzhou Ultraman LoRA Platform Case

Users trained and shared Ultraman LoRA models and images. Identifiable risks, available intervention and direct revenue supported a finding of contributory infringement.

Court or tribunal
Hangzhou Internet Court; Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court
Representative decision date
30 December 2024
Procedural status
Appeal dismissed and judgment upheld; Zhejiang High People’s Court representative-case report
Case number
(2024)浙0192民初1587号;(2024)浙01民终10332号

01

Factual background & dispute

  • The platform offered base models, LoRA training and sharing.
  • Users supplied training images and published models with cover and sample images.
  • The rights holder alleged copyright infringement and unfair competition.

02

Core issues & judicial focus

  1. User content versus direct platform infringement
  2. Identifiable risks and the duty of care
  3. Separate unfair-competition liability for the business model

03

Judicial finding & holding

  • The operator was liable for contributory, rather than direct, network-dissemination infringement.
  • The court ordered cessation and RMB 30,000 in damages and reasonable expenses.
  • The rights holder’s appeal concerning the rejected unfair-competition claim was dismissed.
Dates & procedural record
  • First-instance finding of contributory infringement; upheld on 30 December.

04

Practical risk implications

01Review recognisable IP, model covers, samples and sharing features together.

02Address both model publication and application, and test for continued dissemination.

03Keep upload, training, publication and intervention logs; do not infer blanket legality of training data from this decision.

PROJECT ENQUIRY

How does this precedent affect your product or litigation?

Consult with our practice team →